ACRO Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 1:  Chief Judge (scoring) - Ian Scott

Ranking Index = 1.98
 McAully, Fenland & Cavendish, Fenland, 24-25 June 2023
Pilot NAT = Judge NAT FPS High value FPS Low value
 Sports - Power, Known + 3
  HZ Anomalies Set to Panel Avg  
 
 Raw and normalised / FPS revised Marks and Scores
FP Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Fig-5 Fig-6 Fig-7 Fig-8 Fig-9 Fig-10 Fig-11 Fig-12 Fig-13 Posi No Raw/FPS J-rank Diff
1 Isabel Rutland - Pit 8.5 8.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 8.5 0 1333.34 1
    S-2A G-ISZA 8.41 8.06 8.86 8.68 9.03 8.20 7.67 7.65 8.76 9.16 8.83 8.83 8.83 8.66   1313.99    
2 Barbara Blythe - H/C 8.5 7.0 7.5 8.5 7.0 9.0 8.0 7.5 9.5 8.0 9.0 8.0 9.0 9.0 0 1289.49 2
    Extra 200 G-GLOC 8.41 7.08 7.50 8.20 7.08 8.68 7.67 7.65 9.16 8.15 8.76 7.67 9.03 9.16   1277.68    
3 James Seward - Pit 8.5 5.0 8.5 8.0 9.0 6.5 7.0 8.0 8.0 8.5 8.0 7.0 9.0 9.0 0 1225.80 3
    S-2E G-KITI 8.41 5.14 8.41 7.71 9.03 6.25 6.50 8.15 7.97 8.66 7.95 7.17 9.03 9.16   1223.11    
4 Jacob Hinson - Ext 8.5 9.0 7.5 8.0 9.0 9.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 7.0 8.0 8.0 8.5 0 1163.52 7 -3
    200 G-GLOC 8.41 9.03 7.50 7.71 9.03 8.68 6.50 6.14 6.37 6.64 7.17 7.67 8.06 8.66   1176.11    
5 Michael Engstler - Ext 9.5 9.0 6.5 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.0 8.0 7.5 7.5 8.0 9.0 7.0 8.0 0 1214.76 5
    330LX G-URGH 9.32 9.03 6.59 7.71 8.06 7.71 6.50 8.15 7.57 7.65 7.67 8.83 6.50 8.15   1216.24    
6 Arjan Vlietman - Ext 9.5 9.0 7.5 6.0 8.5 9.5 7.0 7.5 10.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 0 1221.48 4 +2
    200 G-GLOC 9.32 9.03 7.50 5.77 8.54 9.17 6.50 7.65 9.56 6.14 7.17 7.71 8.06 8.15   1224.13    
7 Martin Luton - RV- 8.5 7.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 9.0 8.5 7.5 6.5 6.0 8.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 0 1199.74 6 +1
    G-DAZZ 8.41 7.08 8.86 6.74 7.08 8.68 8.25 7.65 6.77 6.14 8.06 7.17 7.67 9.16   1204.62    
8 Blair Keen - Ext 6.0 7.0 6.0 8.0 7.0 8.5 8.0 4.0 8.0 7.0 7.5 7.5 7.0 7.0 0 1073.79 8
    200 G-GLOC 6.14 7.08 6.14 7.71 7.08 8.20 7.67 4.12 7.97 7.15 7.57 7.57 6.78 7.15   1106.95    
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   6
 
 Figure Anomalies Summary

Distribution of Raw Marks - Judge vs. Panel

          Judge   O/all    Proportion

 26 max None HZ PZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
 Mark to CHZ - -  
 PZ to CHZ - -  
 AV to CHZ - -  
 AV to Mark - 7    
 PZ to Mark - -  
 HZ to Mark - -  
 Lo to Mark - 1  
 Hi to Mark - 1  

 The 60% rule

 - -  

  Judge Anomalies vs. totals from all Judges

   Judge 1 Raw Marks Panel Average after FPS
 
 Review of Anomalies
Mark anomalies (none)  
 
Score anomalies (none)  
 
 Average and Spread of Marks
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 7.90, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 2.08 Panel average mark = 7.82, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 2.04
 
 Review of RI Contributions per Pilot
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge
FPS score		 Bias
Hi/Lo		 Panel
FPS score		 Score
difference		 Judge
FPS rank		 Panel
FPS rank		 Rank
diff'ce		 RI value
per pilot		 Percent
of total		   RI contributions ranked
  by decreasing size
Jacob Hinson Extra 200 1176.11 -   1217.58 41.47     7     4     - 3     1.38 69.70%
Arjan Vlietman Extra 200 1224.13 -   1203.89 20.24     4     6     + 2     0.53 26.60%
Martin Luton RV-8 1204.62 -   1203.08 1.54     6     7     + 1     0.07 3.70%
                  1.98    
Pilots ranked correctly   Judge
FPS score		   Panel
FPS score		 Score
difference		 Judge
FPS rank		 Panel
FPS rank		        
Isabel Rutland Pitts S-2A 1313.99   1297.04 16.95     1     1            
Barbara Blythe - H/C Extra 200 1277.68   1274.74 2.94     2     2            
James Seward Pitts S-2E 1223.11   1226.33 3.22     3     3            
Michael Engstler Extra 330LX 1216.24   1204.01 12.23     5     5            
Blair Keen Extra 200 1106.95   1123.07 16.12     8     8            
 
 Summary of RI Contributions per Nation
Judge:

Max nation bias = 0.00

 Min = 0.00 Average = 0.00
Panel:

= 0.27

 = -0.50  = -0.12
 
Most favoured Least favoured Judge Avg H/C x 1 Ranking Index totals per nation Using the +/- rank differences to show national bias from the most to the least favoured teams.

Calculations by: FairPlay v2 (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 5.2 Build: 27/06/23