ACRO Single Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 1:  Chief Judge (scoring) - Nick Buckenham

Ranking Index = 1.74

 Cavendish Trophy and GiA, Fenland, 25-26 June 2022
Pilots from
Judges nation
Panel average High value
 HZ anomalies Low value
 Advanced - Power, 1st Unknown Sequence
 
 Raw and normalised / FPS revised Marks and Scores
FP Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Fig-5 Fig-6 Fig-7 Fig-8 Fig-9 Fig-10 Fig-11 Posi No RI / FP J-rank Diff
1 David Thomson 8.5 9.0 9.0 HZ 8.0 9.0 10.0 6.5 8.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 0 2253.7 1
  Extra 330LX G-HEDL 8.51 8.92 8.58 CHZ 7.97 8.58 8.89 6.28 7.45 7.50 7.66 8.51   2226.7    
2 Simon Wood 8.5 8.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 8.0 9.5 PZ 9.0 7.0 6.0 8.5 0 2014.5 3 -1
  Edge 360 G-ZVKO 8.51 8.45 6.75 6.72 7.02 7.66 8.53 0.00 8.17 7.02 5.83 8.51   2041.1    
3 Tony Walsh 8.5 8.0 6.5 9.0 7.0 8.0 10.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 0 2104.7 2 +1
  Extra 300 G-OLAD 8.51 7.97 6.29 8.17 7.02 7.66 8.89 6.84 4.55 7.02 6.75 6.84   2100.7    
4 Paul Elvidge 8.0 8.0 8.5 HZ 6.0 8.0 10.0 3.0 3.0 8.0 8.5 8.5 0 1943.1 4
  Edge 360 G-CDDP 7.95 7.97 8.12 CHZ 6.07 7.66 8.89 2.37 3.83 7.97 8.12 8.51   1964.1    
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   2
 
 Figure Anomalies Summary

Distribution of Raw Marks - Judge vs. Panel

          Judge   O/all    Proportion

10 max None HZ PZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
 Mark to CHZ - -  
 PZ to CHZ - -  
 AV to CHZ - 1  
 AV to Mark - 4    
 PZ to Mark - 1  
 HZ to Mark - 1  
 Lo to Mark - -  
 Hi to Mark - -  

 The 60% rule

- -  

  Judge Anomalies vs. totals from all Judges

  Judge 1 Raw Marks Panel Average after FPS
 
 Review of Anomalies
Mark anomalies (none)  
 
Score anomalies (none)  
 
 Average and Spread of Marks
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 7.71, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 3.00 Panel average mark = 7.46, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 2.69
 
 Review of RI Contributions per Pilot
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge
score
Bias
Hi/Lo
Panel
score
Score
difference
Judge
rank
Panel
rank
Rank
diff'ce
RI value
this pilot
Percent
of total
  RI contributions ranked
  by decreasing size
Simon Wood Edge 360 2005.8 -   2054.9 - 49.1 3 2 - 1 0.94 54.1%
Tony Walsh Extra 300 2079.5 -   2038.2 + 41.3 2 3 + 1 0.80 45.9%
Pilots ranked correctly   Judge
score
  Panel
score
Score
difference
Judge
rank
Panel
rank
       
David Thomson Extra 330LX 2201.3   2203.2 - 1.9 1 1        
Paul Elvidge Edge 360 1947.4   1937.7 + 9.7 4 4        
 
 

Calculations by: FairPlay v2 (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 5.1 Build: 24/06/22