ACRO Single Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 3:  Brian Gleave

Ranking Index = 5.79
 BAeA National Power Advanced Championships, Sleap Airfield 7-10 October 2021
Pilots from
Judges nation		 Panel average High value
 HZ anomalies Low value
 Advanced - Power, Programme 1: Free Known
 
 Raw and normalised / FPS revised Marks and Scores
FP Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Fig-5 Fig-6 Fig-7 Fig-8 Fig-9 Fig-10 Posi No RI / FP J-rank Diff
1 David Kean 9.5 9.0 9.0 9.5 8.5 9.0 8.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.0 0 2991.5 1
  Extra 330LX G-IILX 9.14 8.60 8.34 9.17 8.42 8.63 8.42 7.94 8.22 8.34 8.63   2954.7    
2 David Nichols 9.0 9.5 8.5 8.0 8.5 8.5 7.0 8.0 8.5 2.0 7.5 0 2723.5 3 -1
  Extra 330SC G-IISC 8.63 9.17 8.42 7.94 8.22 7.94 7.00 7.94 8.03 2.74 7.08   2708.3    
3 Maciej Kulaszewski 9.0 9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 7.0 7.5 7.5 7.5 10.0 0 2724.6 2 +1
  GenPro HA-XEN 8.63 8.91 8.03 7.94 7.41 6.96 6.74 7.08 6.90 7.14 9.66   2709.2    
4 Paul Elvidge 8.0 8.0 6.5 7.0 AV 7.5 7.5 8.0 8.5 8.5 7.0 1 2322.1 5 -1
  Edge 360 G-CDDP 7.60 7.47 6.47 6.96 7.40 7.45 7.41 7.54 8.03 7.94 6.56   2554.2    
5 Anthony Walsh 8.5 7.5 Hi 8.5 8.0 7.0 6.5 8.0 6.5 8.5 9.0 9.0 1 2611.7 4 +1
  Extra 300 G-OLAD 8.22 7.45 0.42 7.82 6.74 5.76 7.94 6.05 8.03 8.34 8.63   2351.2    
6 Simon Wood 3.0 6.0 4.0 5.5 4.5 7.5 6.0 5.5 7.5 8.5 Lo 6.0 1 1970.5 6
  Edge 360 G-ZVKO 3.74 5.98 4.02 5.78 4.74 6.90 5.98 5.01 6.90 7.47 9.36   2108.9    
    0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0   4
 
 Figure Anomalies Summary

Distribution of Raw Marks - Judge vs. Panel

          Judge   O/all    Proportion

 14 max None HZ PZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
 Mark to CHZ - -  
 PZ to CHZ - -  
 AV to CHZ - -  
 AV to Mark 1 1    
 PZ to Mark - -  
 HZ to Mark - -  
 Lo to Mark 1 1  
 Hi to Mark 1 1  

 The 60% rule

 - -  

  Judge Anomalies vs. totals from all Judges

   Judge 3 Raw Marks Panel Average after FPS
 
 Review of Anomalies
Mark anomalies   Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge x1 Ch.Judge
Anthony Walsh Fig-3 PZ PZ Hi 8.5 OK
Extra 300 G-OLAD   0.00 0.00 0.42  
Paul Elvidge Fig-5 8.0 6.5 AVGE OK
Edge 360 G-CDDP   7.92 6.87 7.40  
Simon Wood Positioning 8.5 10.0 Lo 6.0 OK
Edge 360 G-ZVKO   9.07 9.65 9.36  
 
Score anomalies (none)  
 
 Average and Spread of Marks
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 7.69, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 3.00 Panel average mark = 7.43, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 2.75
 
 Review of RI Contributions per Pilot
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge
score		 Bias
Hi/Lo		 Panel
score		 Score
difference		 Judge
rank		 Panel
rank		 Rank
diff'ce		 RI value
this pilot		 Percent
of total		   RI contributions ranked
  by decreasing size
Anthony Walsh Extra 300 2575.1 -   2317.1 + 258.0 4 5 + 1 2.68 46.3%
Paul Elvidge Edge 360 2350.3 -   2588.6 - 238.3 5 4 - 1 2.22 38.3%
David Nichols Extra 330SC 2661.9 -   2712.7 - 50.9 3 2 - 1 0.45 7.8%
Maciej Kulaszewski GenPro 2662.7 -   2712.3 - 49.6 2 3 + 1 0.44 7.6%
Pilots ranked correctly   Judge
score		   Panel
score		 Score
difference		 Judge
rank		 Panel
rank		        
David Kean Extra 330LX 2869.9   2790.8 + 79.1 1 1        
Simon Wood Edge 360 2077.4   2075.8 + 1.6 6 6        
 
 Summary of RI Contributions per Nation
Judge:

Max nation bias = 0.45

 Min = 0.00 Average = 0.45
Panel:

= 7.27

 = -4.42  = 2.86
 
Most favoured Least favoured Average Hi x 1 x 5

Ranking Index totals per nation
using the +/- rank differences to show
national bias from the most to the
least favoured teams of Pilots

The number of Pilots in each nation
is shown with the nationality
 

Calculations by: FairPlay v2 (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 5.0 Build: 02/10/21