ACRO Single Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 3:  Brian Gleave

Ranking Index = 0.00
 2021 Newbold Trophy, Breighton, 25-26 September 2021
Pilots from
Judges nation		 Panel average High value
 HZ anomalies Low value
 Advanced - Power, Unknown Sequence
 
 Raw and normalised / FPS revised Marks and Scores
FP Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Fig-5 Fig-6 Fig-7 Fig-8 Fig-9 Fig-10 Fig-11 Fig-12 Posi No RI / FP J-rank Diff
1 Nick Wakefield 9.5 10.0 8.0 9.5 8.0 9.0 8.5 9.0 8.0 7.5 8.0 7.0 9.5 0 2845.6 1
  Extra 330LX G-CLCA 9.29 9.84 8.04 9.29 8.04 8.83 8.61 8.83 8.15 7.69 8.04 7.07 9.49   2858.4    
2 David Nichols 8.0 9.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.0 7.5 8.0 6.0 9.0 0 2625.5 2
  Extra 330SC G-IISC 8.04 8.83 6.10 8.04 8.04 8.33 8.61 8.33 8.15 7.69 8.04 6.10 9.00   2635.7    
3 Paul Elvidge 8.5 9.0 Lo 0.0 8.0 5.0 8.5 8.0 8.0 7.0 6.5 7.5 6.0 8.0 1 2258.1 3
  Edge 360 G-CDDP 8.46 8.83 7.87 8.04 5.55 8.33 8.15 7.82 7.24 6.78 7.63 6.10 8.04   2484.0    
4 Simon Wood 8.0 8.0 HZ 7.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.5 5.0 6.5 3.0 HZ 7.5 1 1813.2 4
  Edge 360 G-ZVKO 8.04 7.82 0.48 7.21 6.38 6.81 7.24 7.32 5.41 6.78 6.01 CHZ 7.55   1882.4    
    0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0   0
 
 Figure Anomalies Summary

Distribution of Raw Marks - Judge vs. Panel

          Judge   O/all    Proportion

 15 max None HZ PZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
 Mark to CHZ - 1  
 PZ to CHZ - -  
 AV to CHZ - -  
 AV to Mark - 1    
 PZ to Mark - -  
 HZ to Mark 1 2  
 Lo to Mark 1 1  
 Hi to Mark - -  

 The 60% rule

 - -  

  Judge Anomalies vs. totals from all Judges

   Judge 3 Raw Marks Panel Average after FPS
 
 Review of Anomalies
Mark anomalies   Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge x1 Ch.Judge
Paul Elvidge Fig-3 7.5 7.5 Lo 0.0 OK
Edge 360 G-CDDP   7.70 7.07 7.87  
Simon Wood Fig-3 0.0 0.0 HZ OK
Edge 360 G-ZVKO   0.00 0.00 0.48  
 
Score anomalies (none)  
 
 Average and Spread of Marks
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 7.69, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 2.37 Panel average mark = 7.75, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 2.17
 
 Review of RI Contributions per Pilot
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge
score		 Bias
Hi/Lo		 Panel
score		 Score
difference		 Judge
rank		 Panel
rank		 Rank
diff'ce		 RI value
this pilot		 Percent
of total		   RI contributions ranked
  by decreasing size
Pilots ranked correctly   Judge
score		   Panel
score		 Score
difference		 Judge
rank		 Panel
rank		        
Nick Wakefield Extra 330LX 2874.8   2845.7 + 29.0 1 1        
David Nichols Extra 330SC 2672.5   2668.3 + 4.2 2 2        
Paul Elvidge Edge 360 2334.8   2402.0 - 67.2 3 3        
Simon Wood Edge 360 1926.0   1892.1 + 33.9 4 4        
 
 Summary of RI Contributions per Nation
Judge:

Max nation bias = 0.00

 Min = 0.00 Average = 0.00
Panel:

= 0.00

 = 0.00  = 0.00
 
Most favoured Least favoured Average x 4

Ranking Index totals per nation
using the +/- rank differences to show
national bias from the most to the
least favoured teams of Pilots

The number of Pilots in each nation
is shown with the nationality
 

Calculations by: FairPlay v2 (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 5.0 Build: 22/09/21