ACRO Single Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 1:  Chief Judge (scoring) - John Royce

Ranking Index = 4.50
 2020 Golding-Barrett, Sleap, 12 September 2020
Judges nation High value
Panel average Low value
 Advanced - Power, Unknown Sequence
 
 Raw and normalised / FPS revised Marks and Scores
FP Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Fig-5 Fig-6 Fig-7 Fig-8 Fig-9 Fig-10 Fig-11 Fig-12 Fig-13 Posi No RI / FP J-rank Diff
1 Nick Wakefield 9.0 7.0 6.5 8.0 7.5 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 8.0 7.5 8.0 7.5 9.0 0 2350.7 1
  Extra 330LX G-CLCA 8.82 6.54 6.24 7.80 7.59 5.81 6.80 7.17 7.17 7.81 7.35 7.61 7.33 8.91   2376.1    
2 Paul Elvidge 7.5 7.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.5 7.5 5.0 5.5 8.0 8.0 4.5 7.0 0 Lo 2007.9 3 -1
  Edge 360 G-CDDP 7.35 6.54 8.26 6.54 6.91 5.22 6.30 7.80 4.65 5.29 7.84 7.61 4.18 6.81   2188.5    
3 Chris Sillls 9.0 8.5 7.5 7.0 7.5 8.5 7.5 7.5 HZ 7.5 7.0 7.5 4.5 8.0 0 2190.4 2 +1
  Edge 540 G-EDGY 8.82 8.44 7.59 6.54 7.59 8.20 7.31 7.80 HZ 7.31 6.86 7.01 4.18 7.86   2200.8    
4 Dave Farley 7.5 7.0 8.5 HZ 7.0 8.0 7.0 7.5 HZ 8.5 6.0 8.0 7.0 AV 2 1758.8 5 -1
  CAP 231 G-GKKI 7.35 6.54 8.94 6.44 6.91 7.61 6.80 7.80 HZ 7.87 5.88 7.61 6.81 7.00   2149.0    
5 David Kean 8.0 8.0 7.5 8.0 8.0 HZ 7.0 7.0 HZ 5.5 7.0 8.0 6.0 7.5 0 1920.3 4 +1
  DR-107 G-IIID 7.84 7.80 7.59 7.80 8.26 HZ 6.80 7.17 HZ 5.29 6.86 7.61 5.75 7.33   1909.1    
6 Tony Walsh AV AV AV AV 7.5 6.5 7.0 7.0 6.0 0.0 7.0 7.0 2.5 8.5 4 1472.2 6
  Extra 300L G-OLAD 6.38 5.85 7.26 6.22 7.59 5.81 6.80 7.17 5.91 0.00 6.86 6.41 2.07 8.39   1756.7    
    1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 1   4
 
 Figure Anomalies Summary

Distribution of Raw Marks - Judge vs. Panel

Judge   O/all       

21 max None HZ PZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
 Mark to CHZ - 2  
 PZ to CHZ - -  
 AV to CHZ - -  
 AV to Mark 5 8    
 PZ to Mark - -  
 HZ to Mark 1 1  
 Lo to Mark - -  
 Hi to Mark - -  

 The 60% rule

 - -  

  Judge Anomalies vs. totals from all Judges

   Judge 1 Raw Marks Panel Average after FPS
 
 Review of Anomalies
Mark anomalies   Ch.Judge Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge x2
Dave Farley Fig-4 HZ 6.5 6.0 OK
CAP 231 G-GKKI   6.44 6.73 6.16  
Dave Farley Positioning AVGE 6.0 7.5 OK
CAP 231 G-GKKI   7.00 6.05 7.95  
Tony Walsh Fig-1 AVGE 6.0 AVGE OK
Extra 300L G-OLAD   6.38 6.38 6.38  
Tony Walsh Fig-2 AVGE 5.5 AVGE OK
Extra 300L G-OLAD   5.85 5.85 5.85  
Tony Walsh Fig-3 AVGE 7.5 AVGE OK
Extra 300L G-OLAD   7.26 7.26 7.26  
Tony Walsh Fig-4 AVGE 6.0 6.0 OK
Extra 300L G-OLAD   6.22 6.29 6.16  
 
Score anomalies     Ch.Judge   Judge 2   Judge 3
Paul Elvidge   Lo 2007.9 2333.0 2273.6
Edge 360 G-CDDP   2188.5
 
 Review of Judge Style and RI Items
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 7.20, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1.89 Panel average mark = 7.04, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 2.12
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge
score		 Bias
Hi/Lo		 Panel
score		 Score
difference		 Judge
rank		 Panel
rank		 Rank
diff'ce		 RI value
this pilot		 Percent
of total		   RI elements ranked
  by decreasing size
Paul Elvidge Edge 360 2126.9 Lo  2259.3 - 132.4 3 2 - 1 1.41 31.4%
David Kean DR-107 2067.4 -   1974.4 + 93.0 4 5 + 1 1.14 25.2%
Dave Farley CAP 231 1957.4 -   2041.0 - 83.6 5 4 - 1 0.99 21.9%
Chris Sillls Edge 540 2251.2 -   2164.3 + 86.9 2 3 + 1 0.97 21.5%
Pilots ranked correctly   Judge
score		   Panel
score		 Score
difference		 Judge
rank		 Panel
rank		  
Nick Wakefield Extra 330LX 2360.2   2336.0 + 24.2 1 1        
Tony Walsh Extra 300L 1762.4   1750.5 + 11.9 6 6        
 
 
Calculations by: FairPlay v2 (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 4.4 Build: 01/09/20