ACRO Single Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 4:  Chris Sills

Ranking Index = 5.30
Open Club Event, Little Gransden, 02.06.2018
Judges nation High value
Panel / neutral Low value
Club, 2nd Known Sequence
 
Raw and normalised / FPS revised marks and scores
FP Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Fig-5 Posi No RI / FP J-rank Diff
1 Vincent van Paemel 7.0 7.0 8.0 8.5 9.0 8.5 0 570.5 3 -2
  Extra 200 G-EEEK 6.85 6.85 7.61 8.46 8.74 8.46   514.6    
2 Caleb Whitehead 9.0 6.5 9.0 7.0 8.0 8.5 0 573.6 2
  Extra 200 G-EEEK 8.84 6.36 8.74 7.21 7.61 8.46   574.9    
3 Roger Ganpatsingh 7.0 8.5 9.0 8.0 8.5 8.5 0 Hi 596.0 1 +2
  Pitts S-2A G-ODDS 6.85 8.34 8.74 8.04 8.17 8.46   578.8    
4 Graham Kehily 7.0 7.5 8.0 6.0 8.5 9.0 0 550.3 5 -1
  Extra 200 G-EEEK 6.85 7.35 7.61 6.37 8.17 8.88   565.6    
5 Pedro Tavares 5.0 7.0 8.0 8.0 9.0 8.5 0 537.3 6 -1
  Pitts S-2A G-ODDS 4.87 6.85 7.61 8.04 8.74 8.46   548.9    
6 Robert Lough 8.5 8.0 7.5 6.5 8.0 8.0 0 565.3 4 +2
  Pitts S-2A G-ODDS 8.34 7.85 7.04 6.79 7.61 8.04   532.3    
7 Robbie Conington 6.0 8.0 8.0 6.5 6.5 8.5 0 523.5 7
  Pitts S-2A G-ODDS 5.86 7.85 7.61 6.79 6.08 8.46   568.2    
8 John Power 8.0 6.5 8.0 5.5 9.0 6.0 0 522.5 8
  Extra 200 G-EEEK 7.85 6.36 7.61 5.95 8.74 6.48   516.7    
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1   8
 
FPS revised marks Distribution of raw marks
  Mark to CHZ -     13 max None HZ PZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
  PZ to CHZ -    
  AV to CHZ -    
  AV to Mark -    
  PZ to Mark -    
  HZ to Mark -    
  Lo to Mark -    
  Hi to Mark -    

  The 60% rule

-

   
This judge's raw marks
Whole panel after FPS
 
Review of anomalies
Mark anomalies (none)  
 
Score anomalies    Ch.Judge  Judge 2  Judge 3  Judge 4
Roger Ganpatsingh   Lo 523.6 591.5 534.8 Hi 596.0
Pitts S-2A G-ODDS   567.7 565.6
 
Review of Judge style and RI items
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 7.71, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1.91 Panel average mark = 7.58, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1.83
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge
score		 Bias
Hi/Lo		 Panel
score		 Score
difference		 Judge
rank		 Panel
rank		 Rank
diff'ce		 RI value
this pilot		 Percent
of total		   RI elements ranked
  by decreasing size
Roger Ganpatsingh Pitts S-2A 595.1 Hi 566.3 + 28.8 1 3 + 2 1.70 32.1%
Vincent van Paemel Extra 200 570.8 - 600.3 - 29.5 3 1 - 2 1.64 30.9%
Robert Lough Pitts S-2A 565.8 - 540.4 + 25.5 4 6 + 2 1.57 29.7%
Pedro Tavares Pitts S-2A 539.2 - 546.3 - 7.1 6 5 - 1 0.22 4.1%
Graham Kehily Extra 200 551.5 - 557.1 - 5.6 5 4 - 1 0.17 3.2%
Pilots ranked correctly   Judge
score		   Panel
score		 Score
difference		 Judge
rank		 Panel
rank		  
Caleb Whitehead Extra 200 573.7   576.9 - 3.2 2 2        
Robbie Conington Pitts S-2A 526.0   537.8 - 11.9 7 7        
John Power Extra 200 525.0   522.1 + 2.9 8 8        
 
 
Calculations by: FairPlay v2 (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 4.3 Build: 28/05/18