ACRO Single Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 1:  Chief Judge (scoring) - Ian Scott

Ranking Index = 5.88
Nat Alony, Cavendish and Legg, Elvington, 22nd - 24th April
Judges nation High value
Panel / neutral Low value
Intermediate, 1st Unknown Sequence
 
Raw and normalised / FPS revised marks and scores
FP Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Fig-5 Fig-6 Fig-7 Fig-8 Fig-9 Fig-10 Fig-11 Posi No RI / FP J-rank Diff
1 Dave Farley 9.0 10.0 Lo 0.0 8.5 6.5 8.0 9.0 7.5 7.5 7.0 6.0 8.5 1 1603.3 3 -2
  Pitts S-2A G-BTTR 8.76 9.60 8.13 8.50 6.42 7.99 8.60 7.19 7.07 7.01 6.07 8.68   1160.6    
2 Stephen Evans 9.5 10.0 7.5 8.0 7.0 8.0 8.5 6.5 9.0 8.0 7.0 8.5 0 1766.0 1 +1
  Laser 200 G-CBHR 9.32 9.60 7.42 8.01 7.01 7.99 8.11 5.70 8.76 8.18 7.04 8.68   1705.0    
3 Jan Nijhof - NED 8.0 10.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 8.0 8.5 7.5 HZ 9.0 8.0 7.0 1 1569.1 4 -1
  Pitts S-1T N196JR 7.63 9.60 6.85 7.04 7.01 7.99 8.11 7.19 8.12 9.35 8.01 6.45   1724.8    
4 David Slater 6.5 Lo 0.0 8.5 9.0 8.5 8.0 6.5 8.0 8.0 7.0 4.0 9.0 1 1627.5 2 +2
  Pitts S-1T G-BKPZ 5.94 9.19 8.55 8.99 8.77 7.99 6.12 7.93 7.63 7.01 4.12 9.42   1672.9    
5 Graeme Fudge HZ 9.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 8.5 7.5 8.0 6.0 4.0 Lo 5.0 1 1298.5 5
  CAP 232 G-CBUA HZ 8.60 6.85 7.04 5.83 5.72 8.11 7.19 7.63 5.83 4.12 8.48   1694.1    
6 Iain Smith 7.0 8.0 6.5 HZ 7.5 6.0 7.0 6.0 HZ 6.0 4.0 8.5 2 1188.2 6
  Pitts S-2A G-ISZA 6.50 7.61 6.28 HZ 7.59 5.72 6.62 CHZ 5.52 5.83 4.12 8.68   1410.3    
    0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 6 0   6
 
FPS revised marks Distribution of raw marks
  Mark to CHZ 1     12 max None HZ PZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
  PZ to CHZ -    
  AV to CHZ -    
  AV to Mark -    
  PZ to Mark -    
  HZ to Mark 2    
  Lo to Mark 3    
  Hi to Mark -    

  The 60% rule

-

   
This judge's raw marks
Whole panel after FPS
 
Review of anomalies
Mark anomalies   Ch.Judge Judge 2 Judge 3 CHZ's
Dave Farley Fig-3 Lo 0.0 8.0 7.5 OK
Pitts S-2A G-BTTR   8.13 7.60 7.82  
David Slater Fig-2 Lo 0.0 9.0 9.0 OK
Pitts S-1T G-BKPZ   9.19 8.98 9.39  
Graeme Fudge Position Lo 5.0 8.5 8.5 OK
CAP 232 G-CBUA   8.48 8.65 8.32  
Iain Smith Fig-8 6.0 HZ AVGE CHZ
Pitts S-2A G-ISZA   HZ HZ HZ  
Iain Smith Fig-9 HZ 5.5 5.0 OK
Pitts S-2A G-ISZA   5.52 5.62 5.43  
Jan Nijhof - NED Fig-9 HZ 8.0 8.0 OK
Pitts S-1T N196JR   8.12 8.10 8.15  
 
Score anomalies (none)    
 
Review of Judge style and RI items
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 7.55, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 2.33 Panel average mark = 7.43, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 2.50
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge
score		 Bias
Hi/Lo		 Panel
score		 Score
difference		 Judge
rank		 Panel
rank		 Rank
diff'ce		 RI value
this pilot		 Percent
of total		   RI elements ranked
  by decreasing size
Dave Farley Pitts S-2A 1639.8 - 1738.1 - 98.3 3 1 - 2 2.73 46.4%
Stephen Evans Laser 200 1806.2 - 1700.2 + 106.0 1 2 + 1 1.50 25.6%
David Slater Pitts S-1T 1664.6 - 1632.2 + 32.4 2 4 + 2 0.96 16.3%
Jan Nijhof - NED Pitts S-1T 1604.8 - 1652.1 - 47.3 4 3 - 1 0.69 11.7%
Pilots ranked correctly   Judge
score		   Panel
score		 Score
difference		 Judge
rank		 Panel
rank		  
Graeme Fudge CAP 232 1328.0   1360.5 - 32.5 5 5        
Iain Smith Pitts S-2A 1215.2   1175.6 + 39.6 6 6        
 
 
Calculations by: FairPlay (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 4.1 Build: 21/04/16
This report created at 13:29 on Sunday 24 April 2016